This is a bit late, as I meant to blog about it last week, when I first heard about it: Google has changed their algorithm in order to try to get content farms — websites that churn out massive amounts of poorly written content — off the first couple of pages of search engine results. A high ranking in search results is generally considered to be the jackpot, since most people looking for something online don't search past the first page or two, but content mills often dominate the first page or two. (I assume it's not this way anymore, but as an example, it used to be that almost no matter what you were searching for, Associated Content had an article on the first or second page of results.)
Google, however, has apparently found a way to try to clear spammy content from the top results to make room for the good sites. Here are a couple of articles:
Google declares war on lousy websites
Google's working on saving 'good' websites
I wonder a couple of things, though. First of all, how do they decide what is a "good" content site or a "bad" content site? For example, let's take Yahoo. Yahoo has news articles, community pages, email, etc. — seems like a good content site and online community, right? But not long ago they bought Associated Content, which I would describe as a content farm. So how does Google decide whether or not Yahoo deserves a high ranking?
What are your thoughts? Is this going to be harder to implement than Google thinks, and is it going to have any impact on content farms? Since content farms are a contentious issue for writers, I'm interested in what the rest of you think will happen as a result of Google's new algorithm.
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
Are content farms on the way out?
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I try to keep this blog mostly writing-related, but every once in a while I see something in the news that I just have to comment about. Tod...
This is a very long post, but the information contained in it is potentially very important, so please bear with me. On Monday I read a very...
Please see the bottom of this post for an update. Quite recently, I blogged about an email I received from Rob Palmer, the president of GoF...
Please scroll down for an update on this post. My posts on Freelance Work Exchange ( now GoFreelance.com ) have always attracted a lot of h...
Several months ago, Rob Palmer emailed me regarding my blog posts regarding GoFreelance.com, formerly known as Freelance Work Exchange or Fr...
Not long ago, I was browsing on Facebook when I saw an ad for a software that automagically generates blog posts for you. This was news to m...
Interesting title for a meme. Anyway, I've been tagged thanks to The Insane Writer . I was confused by the rules of the post, so I trace...
When I was writing an article today, I used the word "agreeance," and Word automatically flagged it. I was flabbergasted. Althou...
I have a love-hate relationship with productivity. I love to get things done, but I'm also a horrible procrastinator. I'm constant...
If you have signed up for the Muse Online Writing Conference , don't forget that your event choices are due by Tuesday, September 25th. ...
I looked at a freelance writing job that involved writing 250 blog posts a week for some company that helps people get their websites further up in the search engines. I couldn't imagine that anyone could write 250 QUALITY posts in a week.
I know the kind of thing you're talking about -- and usually the pay is crap, too. You're right, it's NOT quality content, but the sites don't care -- which is why we have so much junk floating around on the Internet!
Post a Comment