There have been a few discussion in the online writing community about whether Wikipedia is a valid source. Most people say no, but I disagree: While I don't think it is always reliable or high quality, I do think Wikipedia offers a good source for general or background information, and an excellent jumping-off point for more in-depth research.
But I am getting away from my point: I edited a Wikipedia article just now, and it felt good.
I often find grammatical mistakes and other minor problems in Wikipedia articles, but I've never tried to change them. Tonight I finally did. Someone had written that so-and-so "shot dead" a bunch of people. That bothered me to no end — what is this, a Western? — so I changed it to "shot and killed."
I was pleasantly surprised to see that my change showed up instantly — no review or anything. While that is obviously why there are so many errors in Wikipedia — and why pages never stay the same for very long — I have to admit, it was rather satisfying.
Even for a published writer, who should be above getting her kicks by making changes to lowly Wikipedia articles!
Katharine!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the email. Many things happened recently. I'll email you later. As of now, I just checked in to say hello. I need to go back to sleep. Talk to you later!