I am fascinated by ebooks. Though like many people, I much prefer the feel of a book in my hand, I also believe that ebooks have their uses. They provide instant access to research information, and thanks to compact ebook readers such as the Kindle, enable you to take multiple books with you without changing the amount of purse or luggage space you need. As someone who packs a minimum of three or four books every time I take a trip, this sounds particularly appealing to me.

I first heard of ebook libraries about six months ago, and honestly I can't think of a better idea. With just my normal library subscription (and an account with NetLibrary that my librarian set up for me), I can access hundreds of books instantly and get the information I need, all for free. I can't think of a better

So when I saw an NPR story on libraries that are digitalizing their book collections, I was instantly intrigued. The story talks about how some are opting to handle the digitalizing themselves, while others are relying on Google. Of course, the catch is that books digitalized by Google are only available on Google.

I have gotten research for some of my articles via books digitalized by Google, so after listening to the story I decided to visit Google Books. I was surprised at what I found: hundreds of fully digitalized books to choose from, including popular, modern titles such as Gregory Maquire's Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister. The ebooks are free and fully searchable, the only drawback being that they are only accessible online.

While I understand the concern that books digitalized by Google will only be made available by Google, I also have to admit that Google Books is offering an amazing service here. By scanning books belonging to libraries that can't afford the expense of digitalizing their collections, Google is ensuring that the information is still made available to the general public.

Labels: research

An issue I've seen debated on other writers' blogs is whether researching your articles on the Internet is acceptable. Some writers say that it's not, because it perpetuates the problem of regurgitated content: existing content that is simply rewritten and republished.

While I see the logic to this argument, I think this argument can be applied to any resource used for research. If a writer picks out a magazine at the newsstand, paraphrases an article, and sells it to a content site, what's the difference from the Internet-based scenario?

The basis for quality work lies not in the source of the information, but in the individual writer's skills — how good they are at researching, and then weaving the information they find into a unique new article.

Many writers (like me) enjoy being able to do all their research and writing from the comfort of their own home, but that doesn't mean the quality of our work has to suffer. Here are my tips for researching your articles online:

1. Use multiple sources. If you have an English degree, you learned this one in college: The best way to not inadvertently plagiarize is to use many sources on the same subject. I was taught that for scholarly papers, you should have at least as many sources as you have pages. That means a separate source for every 250 words.

I think that should probably be almost doubled for good content writing — I typically have 3 to 4 sources for short (500 or 600 words) articles, and 5 or more for longer articles.

2. Find a slant. Think of a new way to approach the material. The individual facts might still be found elsewhere online, but by finding a new way of looking at the material, you add to and improve the available content on the subject.

3. Know how to use your sources. A lot of writers scorn anyone who uses Wikipedia as a source. Personally, I think Wikipedia is great for two purposes: as a source for background information or commonly known facts, or as a jumping-off point for more in-depth research. In particular, I've found the outside links listed at the end of each article to be extremely helpful.

4. Do more than just Google. There are ways to search more traditional sources without venturing away from your computer. Online databases such as EBSCO are a great way to access traditional and scholarly print publications, and may be accessible for free through your public library or school website (even as an alumni). Also, some public libraries allow you to "borrow" ebooks via services such as NetLibrary (which I also blogged about here).

This post was inspired by the news that my public library is now offering access to EBSCO and other resources. Even though I still have access through my school's website (more than three years after graduation!), I was pretty excited about this new resource. It just goes to show how easily technology can replace — and redefine — traditional processes such as research.

Labels: research